Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡°ú¿ë ½ºÄ³³Ê·Î äµæÇÑ µðÁöÅÐ ¸ðÇüÀÇ ¹Ýº¹¼º ¹× ÀçÇö¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ 3Â÷¿øÀû Æò°¡

Three-dimensional evaluation on the repeatability and reproducibility of dental scanner-based digital models

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±â°øÇÐȸÁö 2012³â 34±Ç 3È£ p.213 ~ 220
ÀÌ°æŹ, ±èÀçÈ«, ±è¿õö, ±èÁöȯ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌ°æŹ ( Lee Gyeong-Tak ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø º¸°Ç°úÇаú
±èÀçÈ« ( Kim Jae-Hong ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø º¸°Ç°úÇаú
±è¿õö ( Kim Woong-Chul ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø º¸°Ç°úÇаú
±èÁöȯ ( Kim Ji-Hwan ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø º¸°Ç°úÇаú

Abstract


Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the repeatability and reproducibility of two dental scanners.

Methods: The master die and the stone replicas(Kavo, Germany) were digitized in touch-probe scanner(Incise, Renishaw, UK), white light scanner(Identica, Medit, Korea) to create 3-dimensional surface-models. The number of points in the point clouds from each reading were calculated and used as the CAD reference model(CRM). Discrepancies between the points in the 3-dimensional surface models and the corresponding CRM were measured by a matching-software(Power-Inspect R2, Delcam Plc, UK). The t-student test for one samples were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The reproducibility of both scanner was within , based on mean value. The mean value between measurements made directly on the touch probe scanner digital models and those made on the white light scanner digital models was , and was statistically significant(P<0.05).

Conclusion: With respect to adequate data acquisition, the reproducibility of dental scanner differs. Three-dimensional analysis can be applied to differential quality analysis of the manufacturing process as well as to evaluation of different analysis methods.

Å°¿öµå

CRM(CAD Reference Model); dental scanner; digital model; point cloud; repeatability; reproducibility

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI